Archive for the ‘Strategic Competencies’ Category

Next Steps: Will we be ready to take advantage of the improving economy as it arrives?

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010
Strategic Planning Expert

Strategic Planning Expert

by M. Dana Baldwin, Senior Consultant

In my prior article (“Time to Start Planning for Growth – Step One: Analysis“), we discussed the lessons we should be learning from the major slowdown in business experienced during the recession, and how to analyze them so we would be positioned to plan to grow as business improves.

As indicated in the previous article, we tried to learn what our markets would be looking for as their business improves.  We studied the competition to learn how they were reacting to the slowdown in business during the recession.  We probed for weaknesses and looked to see where our competitors pulled back and possibly even lowered service levels.  We tried to anticipate what the market would be asking for as business improved in order to be positioned to better serve the market in the future. 

Now that it appears that the recession is ebbing, and growth is returning to the economy, what steps should our company be taking to establish strategies that will lead to improving our sales and our profits? 

First, we need to revisit our strategic planning.  In order to take the best advantage of our earlier work, we must review our market segments to obtain the best information on which we will base our strategies.  Especially important is the updating of our assumptions.  The efficacy of our work on assumptions will guide our future course and direction, so the importance of doing this well and thoroughly cannot be overemphasized.  Good work here will mean we likely will have appropriate strategies for our core market segments. 

Another key part of strategic planning is our focus on new opportunities.  Part of our work to establish our future course and direction will be started with our brainstorming of perceived opportunities.  At least some of these perceived opportunities should come from the analysis we did in our pre-planning efforts (discussed in the prior article).  These efforts should have resulted in our looking for what our customers and prospective customers will be seeking as they recover, and should be targeted at responding to their anticipated needs and preferences. 

Once we have established the products and services which our markets – both current customers and future prospects – will be seeking, we need to determine what our responses will be.  We need to assess each opportunity to determine how each one will address the future needs and preferences of our prospects, and how each one will fit into our future.  How does each relate to our capabilities and our strategic competency?  Is each opportunity a good fit with our course and direction?  Selecting those which fit our future direction and which utilize our strengths and competencies, and which meet the anticipated needs of our customers and prospects is a key to our future success. 

Next step is the actual execution of our strategies and our action plans.  Action plans are simply the step by step roadmap which will be used to accomplish our objectives.  A detailed action plan with responsibilities assigned and dates agreed upon is the key tool in accomplishing the objective.  Monthly update meetings are used to keep our action plans on time.  In the monthly update sessions, the action plan leaders report on progress, confirm schedules for the upcoming month and make any updates or changes needed to make the action plan effective.  Pulling all this together and getting our strategies and action plans executed effectively are keys to our profitability in the future. 

If you’ve been dragging your feet about doing SP because of the cost or uncertainty, ”bite the bullet, and get going”.  It’s ultimately about execution, but intelligent formulation of strategic direction is necessary first. And the time is now! 

M. Dana Baldwin is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. and can be reached at baldwin@cssp.com.

© Copyright 2010 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution.

Three Keys to Recovery Success:Re-focus Your Efforts to Outperform Your Competition

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

By Denise Harrison, Vice President

Strategic Planning Expert

Strategic Planning Expert

Recently I was talking to a company president – he was frustrated that a large project was off track.  What happened?  Well, during the recession, his team bid on a significant contract for a large company; the contract included requirements that were a stretch for his company.  Traditionally the team focused on small to mid-sized businesses, but during the recession they decided to bid on this contract in order to bring in additional revenue.  The result?  Resources were being pulled off other projects to meet these requirements, and unfortunately the large customer was not happy because the project was not progressing smoothly.  Even worse, the smaller traditional customers were unhappy because resources normally available to them were working on the large project.  Has the recession caused your company to take on business that is pulling you away from profitable business? 

Re-focus Your Efforts 

Yes, during a recession it is easy to look at any business as good business.  But often companies take on business that does not leverage their competencies and/or causes it to misallocate resources. This new business may cause resources to be spread too thinly, working on projects that may bring in revenue, but are not profitable, or, more critically, divert resources from core, profitable customers.  In order to emerge from the recession in a strong position, it is important that you take the following three steps: 

1.      Re-assess what your company does well: “Know thyself”

a.       Understand where your competencies are:  what are those skills, processes and knowledge that are most valuable to your customers?

b.      Know what your company does do well, and what it does not do well, so you will concentrate on serving the customers who value what you do not only during the recession, but for the long term.

2.      Identify market segments or customer groups that you currently serve – and focus on the ones who value what you do well: “Cherish thy core”

a.       Do these segments/customers select your company because they value the things that you are good at doing? These are the customers that will be profitable.

b.      Or are there some segments/customers that simply came to you during the recession when you were trying to get business – any business to shore up the top-line. Re-focus on the profitable segments.

3.      Once you have identified the segments that value your competencies then look within the segment and identify who the winning customers will be during this recovery: “Know thy customers”

a.       Customers who were doing well before the recession may not be the same ones who are doing well after the recession. 

           i.      Some customers within these segments are not positioned to grow during the recovery.  Many         have taken cuts that will not allow them to take advantage of the recovery. Others are still hurting financially.

           ii.      Industries may have changed and requirements for gaining market share may have altered – different companies make take the lead.  Look at how the landscape in the financial industry has changed – some market participants are gone – others merged with more successful companies. Identify who the winners will be during this recovery. 

Often recessions cause you to de-focus your efforts.  As you develop your strategy for the recovery make sure your team re-focuses its efforts so that it is concentrating on leveraging the competencies that you have and that your customers value.   These will be the segments and customers that will allow your company to grow profitably during this recovery. This renewed focus will allow your team to outperform your less disciplined competitors who are still chasing business, as if all business is good business.

Denise Harrison is Vice President of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  She can be reached at harrison@cssp.com

Time to Start Planning for Growth – Step One: Analysis

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

By M. Dana Baldwin, Senior Consultant

Strategic Planning Expert
Strategic Planning Expert

As we get further into 2010, the time has come to start planning for the uptick in the economy.  No, it likely will not be a “V” shaped recovery.  And, if the government and the Federal Reserve get it wrong, we could have a “W” shaped double dip rather than a recovery.  But, sooner or later, the economy will recover, and you would do well to plan for it and to be ready when the indicators turn positive essentially across the board.  

So, what is involved in this planning for the recovery?  To be ready, there are a number of areas you should check out and be ready for.  First: will your customers after the recovery begins be the same customers you were selling before and during the recession?  Have you serviced them well enough that they will continue to want to do business with you?  Do you have the relationships deeply enough established that you will continue to enjoy their business in the future? 

Second: What will you be selling in the future, as compared with what you sold prior to the slowdown, and with what you actually were selling during the slow period we are just beginning to emerge from now? 

Third: What do you want to sell going forward?  Are there any lessons you have learned about your business, your products and services, that can translate forward into more business, more profits and better products and services for your customers, present and future?  What did you do well for your customers during the slowdown, and what did you learn about yourself, your products and services, and your customers that will make your future better and more profitable? 

Fourth: Why were you able to sustain your business during the recession?  What was it that your customers valued that kept your business viable?  What did you stop doing during the recession that impacted your bottom line, either positively or negatively?  What did you learn from the changes you made in order to get through the tough times?  How can these lessons be applied toward ensuring success as business improves? 

We have posed a lot of questions above, and getting the answers will involve considerable effort and introspection.  The challenges of the future must be analyzed objectively and systematically in order to learn from the events so we may prosper as the economic activity improves.  At the same time, we must be objective about making changes to support increased activities, so we do not lag behind the curve and miss opportunities, and so we don’t leap too far, burdening our companies with increased costs and commitments. 

This is where a formal, well-structured, objective strategic planning process comes into play.  In order to be properly prepared, with milestones for making changes, and contingency plans for various scenarios, a thorough planning process is key to steering toward success.  Without an objective analysis of the past, along with a realistic set of goals, objectives and strategies to follow for the future, you may not be able to take advantage of the opportunities which will come along as the economic atmosphere improves.  Planning is essential for success, and this planning should likely start soon so you are prepared when the tide changes.

M. Dana Baldwin is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. and can be reached at baldwin@cssp.com.

© Copyright 2010 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution. 

Here We Go Again – The End of Strategic Planning is Forecast – Again

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

By M. Dana Baldwin, Senior Consultant

Strategic Planning Expert
Strategic Planning Expert

In a recent issue of The Wall Street Journal, an article forecasts the end of Strategic Planning – again.  In the article, the efficacy of strategic planning is questioned in some depth.  Instead of utilizing strategic planning properly, the article suggests that flexibility and responsiveness will be enhanced by reacting to the market place because of the fast moving nature of today’s market place. 

In reality, if a company follows the Simplified Strategic Planning process that we have espoused for nearly 30 years, the company actually enhances the flexibility and responsiveness that the article implies can only be achieved with these “new” processes. 

Let’s examine the elements of strategic planning to be sure we fully understand the implications of the process.  First: In order to start effectively, a company must know where it currently is positioned in the market place.  We will examine our markets – customers and products/services they buy.  We will analyze our competition to see where they are strong and where they are weak.  We will look at the technologies involved in making or providing our products and services, those involved in the internal processes within our company, like IT, and where applicable, the technologies utilized in our actual products or services themselves.  We will look into our suppliers, both people and materials or services which we buy.  We will analyze the effects of the parts of the economy which affect our business and we will determine what role regulations, both governmental and industry-approved, play in our business.  All of this is done looking at today’s situation and at the recent history of the company in order to have a good understanding of where we are starting our planning from. 

We will look inside the company to be sure we have strong financial reporting systems and processes, and we will seek to track the metrics of our performance.  The goal of this tracking of metrics is to help us determine trends in the areas of finance, customers, internal measures, and innovation and learning.  We will also look at our strengths and weaknesses to learn what we should emphasize and what we should avoid or change.  Finally, we will determine our Strategic Competency – our sustainable competitive advantage — to verify what we must do to build our business (rework) most effectively.  Having done all this, we will understand where we stand in our markets relative to what customers want and need, and relative to our competition.  We will understand how we compete and the basis for that competitive advantage we will seek to exploit. 

Only after establishing where we are and our strengths, can we begin to develop strategies to effectively compete.  By skipping this first part of a good strategic planning process, a company could well miss what the true basis for competing effectively is – for that particular company – and could misconstrue what strategies will be effective in the markets they are competing in.  Without going through the basics, which really do not take all that much time, considering the good that can arise from doing them, the choices the company may make could lead them astray, and could make them less competitive or, even worse, headed in the wrong direction.  There is no substitute for pursuing an effective strategic planning process which will lead to good strategies for penetrating and exploiting the market places in which you are competing.  The process does not have to be lengthy, it can be done quickly enough to be responsive to the changes that are happening in our rapidly evolving markets, and once done, can be revised very quickly should the need arise.

M. Dana Baldwin is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. and can be reached at baldwin@cssp.com.

© Copyright 2010 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution. 

Success Sows the Seeds of Failure – Toyota’s Complacency Causes Reputation to Crash

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

By Denise Harrison, Vice President

Strategic Planning Expert
Strategic Planning Expert

Can success breed failure? This seems like an oxymoron doesn’t it? But world class companies continue to fall into this trap – Toyota is the latest example.  Toyota gained market share in the automotive market by focusing on quality – this was their strategic competency.  This single-minded concentration on quality built trust with consumers worldwide, wooing consumers away from other less conscientious manufacturers. But the recent recall of millions of Toyota vehicles over several model years shows how Toyota’s loss of focus on quality has severely damaged the trust that had been built up over decades.  The cost of the recall will be millions of dollars in the short-term, but the loss of future sales and its reputation is incalculable. 

Toyota – Culture of Quality 

How did Toyota institutionalize its quality culture?  One aspect of the “Toyota Way” is that newly hired engineers were mentored for 10 years to ensure that they are fully imbued with the values around which the culture is built. Another aspect of the quality culture was the concentration on analyzing consumer complaints and acting on the analysis quickly.  However, when Toyota set its goal to become the world’s largest automotive manufacturer, it lost sight of the key values that gave it its reputation in the first place.  In order to meet its growth targets Toyota had to hire many new engineers globally; however it did not have the senior engineers available to mentor the new team in the manner that it had in the past.  In addition, it no longer spent as much time analyzing consumer complaints – and in some cases it came up with low cost “fixes” (e.g. replacing floor mats in response to complaints of sticky accelerator pedals).  One final aspect of the decline was that Toyota did not share safety information worldwide, so problems that cropped up in Europe were not shared with the US.  Hence its “failure to connect the dots”, as stated by Akio Toyoda when commenting on the recent recall. 

What Should We Learn? 

Toyota’s early growth resulted from its relentless pursuit of quality – this was its strategic competency; however, it lost its way when growth took priority.  When you lose sight of your strategic competency, the very differentiator that gives you your competitive advantage, you will damage your reputation in the market. This reputation often takes decades to build.  So as you look to grow, make sure that the growth does not cause you to grow faster than you can grow your strategic competency. This means that you must have plans to ensure your intellectual capital (strategic competency) grows at the same pace as your sales growth.  This competency expansion is a critical consideration as you develop your strategy.

Denise Harrison is Vice President of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  She can be reached at harrison@cssp.com.

Is your New Product Development Process Complete?

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

By M. Dana Baldwin, Senior Consultant

Strategic Planning Expert
Strategic Planning Expert

How is your total new product development process performing for your company?  There are a number of elements to consider before answering this question. Elements of the analysis should likely include: Market Intelligence sufficiently equipped to provide well-documented and well-thought-out analyses of potential new products and markets; Development capabilities sufficient to actually develop the new products specified by the market intelligence at the appropriate level of costs, including marketing, selling and distribution costs; production capabilities appropriate to make the products developed; marketing and sales abilities to promote and sell the products; distribution/logistics with the capacities to stock and deliver the products as needed.

First: How well does your market intelligence report on the real needs and preferences of your customers, current and/or targeted?  Effective market intelligence is a necessary element to an effective product development process.  By properly analyzing your customers’ wants and requirements, what your competition is offering and what your company is capable of delivering, market intelligence should help your company focus its product development process on those projects which show the best possibilities for success in the future.  Financial analyses which include the costs of development, manufacturing costs, logistics and distribution costs, selling and marketing costs should be detailed, along with an assessment of appropriate pricing should be completed early in the process with a goal of pursuing those projects with the highest likelihood of success as well as another goal of eliminating those projects which probably won’t reach your profit and sales volume goals. 

Second: Does your new product development (NPD) group possess the tools and knowledge needed to develop the products recommended by marketing?  Do they have time to devote to these new products, or are they already committed to other development projects?  Do you maintain and regularly update your NPD priority list to be sure that your assets are employed in their highest and best use?  At the same time, are you allowing your NPD group to jump from project to project or are they focusing on projects within their capabilities and pursuing them to completion? 

Third: In your NPD process, do you involve production in the development process to be sure that any new product developed can actually be produced on the production equipment your company has?  If your company does not have the capability to manufacture, do you have the outside resources available to provide the productive capacity needed to bring the product to market?  At the same time, do you have the internal ability to effectively work with and monitor the external production of your products to assure timely delivery and appropriate quality and adherence to standards you require? 

Fourth: Do marketing and sales have the capability to promote and sell the products developed?  Do they have the contacts and channels needed to actually bring the product to those who will be buying the newly developed product?  Does marketing have the talent and capacity to promote the new product effectively?  Does sales have the necessary abilities to sell the product to potential users? 

Fifth: Once the product is sold, does distribution/logistics have the ability and capacity to deliver the products as needed?  If you can’t get the product to the buyers, it can’t be successful.  Do you have the distribution network necessary for getting the product to market?  

While this is not an exhaustive checklist, it does point at key elements in any new product development process, which should be included in the overall analysis of whether to proceed or not with a specific project. 

Digging Deeper:  The author recommends referring to Elements of Innovation, a collection of articles by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning consultants (available through www.cssp.com).  See specifically the diagram on page 71 – also found in the article “Innovative Measures” in the Article Archives of www.cssp.com

M. Dana Baldwin is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. and can be reached at baldwin@cssp.com.

© Copyright 2009 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution

Gaining Strategic Alignment Between Business Units

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

By Robert W. Bradford, CEO/President

Strategic Planning Expert Robert Bradford
Strategic Planning Expert Robert Bradford

The other day I was talking with a CEO about building strategic alignment between business units in his organization.  I was intrigued, because my questions about the company’s strategic competency yielded a history of the company – but no clear sense of strategic competency.  In other words, the CEO knew WHY the company had the dozens of different products and markets they had – but not why it made sense to have all of those business units in one company.

On reflection, many of the business units had elements in common – some sold to similar markets, made similar products, or used similar processes.  There were even a few that could be combined into a vertically integrated supply chain.  But all of this was the result of opportunistic acquisition – not a clearly defined strategy of building skills, processes and knowledge around a true strategic competency.  Without question, in this situation, the key to good strategic alignment – getting the business units pulling together into a company with a unified strategy – is a clear, concise definition of a true strategic competency.

Those of you who have been to our Simplified Strategic Planning seminar will recall that a strategic competency is a combination of skills, processes and knowledge that create value for your customers, differentiate you from your competition and are difficult to copy.  As the global economy makes the world smaller and more commoditized, true strategic competency is the key to profitability for any successful company you can name.  I can name small delis that have a strategic competency…and large multinationals that do not.  Interestingly, the existence of a true strategic competency seems to correlate with long term profitability and – perhaps more importantly – the ability to weather ups and downs in your market environment.

When considering questions of strategic alignment, it’s always a good idea to start with a clear understanding of your strategic competency.  If it’s real, everyone in your company will “get it”, and it will be simple to focus on building your business around it.  If you try to work with an unrealistic strategic competency, it’s very likely your people will fail to support it because they simply can’t believe in it.  A workable strategic competency does not have to be something you are the best in the world at – but you do have to have a realistic shot at that title.  If you do, everyone in your organization will have something they can align with and strive for.  If you don’t, your strategies can be just another “make believe” exercise that fails to garner the necessary support below the top level of your organization.  The larger your company is, the more important this characteristic of strategic competency becomes.

In the case of the CEO I spoke with at the top of the article, the key for his organization is to: first, arrive at a clear understanding of the company’s strategic competency, and then realistically assess the relationship of each business unit to that competency.  It’s likely some business units will not support the ultimate competency – and those units should be spun off, sold, or (in the worst cases) closed down.  In the best of all possible worlds, each business unit would find a place supporting a strategic competency either independently, or as part of another company whose strategic competencies are well served by the skills, processes and knowledge present in that business unit.  This approach would lead to greater profitability for each business unit, and a much clearer shared sense of direction for the company as a whole.

Robert Bradford is President/CEO of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached at rbradford@cssp.com. 
 

 

How Can Smaller Companies Compete and Win?

Friday, September 11th, 2009

by Denise A. Harrison, Vice President

Strategic Planning Expert

Strategic Planning Expert

Smaller companies often feel dwarfed by the giants in their industry, especially during tough times.  Often industry giants are better at weathering economic downturns with their wide array of resources. But Arena Resources’ strategy not only allowed the company to survive this economic downturn, but turn in exceptional performance – better than the industry leaders.  Arena Resources, a small oil exploration and production company, has less than 2% of the revenue of the industry leaders (Shell, Exxon Mobil).  In addition, very few industries have had to endure greater fluctuations than the oil industry with oil price highs of $147 per barrel in July 2008 and lows of $30 per barrel in December, 2008.  How did Arena Resources make it onto the Fortune list of fastest growing companies (#8) in spite of this industry turbulence?

The Road Less Traveled

Arena Resources chose not to compete directly with the industry giants, instead it focused on oil production assets in the southwestern United States that were no longer attractive to the industry Goliaths.  The cost of drilling and producing oil in this region exceeded what was acceptable in the larger companies’ financial models; these companies prefer to concentrate their resources on exploration of large oil fields with large potential.  When Arena purchased land in this region (approximately 11,000 acres), the land produced 200 barrels of oil per day. Arena knew through its research and evolving technology, which through investment the land could be more productive.  Through Arena Resources’ focused efforts this land is now producing 6000 barrels per day.  The company does pay a high cost to produce a barrel of oil – almost $35 per barrel, so when oil prices decline significantly, profitability plummets; but when oil prices are over $60 per barrel the company makes a nice profit. Arena is betting that the price of oil will remain over $60 per barrel for the significant future.  The high cost of production and the relatively small output is not attractive to its behemoth competitors, so this strategy to take the road less traveled allowed Arena Resources to grow profitably without going head- to- head with the major industry players. 

What about Your Company’s Strategy?

Many companies decide to compete in markets that are attractive, even though larger competitors with greater resources are already firmly entrenched or aggressively pursing these markets.  Going head- to- head with industry giants often drains the resources of a smaller player with little forward progress in their market position.  Are you going after the attractive markets that set you in direct conflict with industry giants?  Are there niches that you could pursue that are not interesting to the larger companies? As you develop strategy your team should consider:

1.      Market segment attractiveness (including growth and profitability)

2.      Your competitive position in a market segment – what is the competition’s market share?  Are competitors already firmly entrenched?

a.       What other companies compete in this segment? In this case companies like Exxon and Shell focus their resources on exploration, looking for the big prizes.  Arena focuses on production, but the production increases that are attractive to Arena Resources are too small to concentrate on from a larger company’s perspective.

b.      What are the competencies required to compete this market? Do we have them?  Are there strategic competencies that give us significant differentiation? In Arena Resources’ case, its competency is secondary recovery from known oil and gas resources – little exploration risk but a requirement for execution excellence.  Their competency comes from their knowledge of the geology in the basin in which they work, combined with their technical skills in secondary recovery.

In order to compete and win, you must consider both market attractiveness and the competitive landscape of all of your market segments before you select the ones on which you will focus.  You will often find a segment that is smaller has less competition and will provide your company with significant growth and profitability.  In strategic planning, selecting the road less traveled may be a key ingredient to your company’s success.

Denise Harrison is Vice President of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  She can be reached at harrison@cssp.com.

IS YOUR COMPANY TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE SLOW ECONOMY?

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

by: M Dana Baldwin, Senior Consultant, CSSP, Inc.

Strategic Planning Expert

Strategic Planning Expert

In these uncertain times, it is very important to do things right, right?  Absolutely!  But doing things right is only good if you are doing the right things! What are some of the right things to do?

 

Make your company invaluable to your key customers.  Your company should be focusing on serving your core customers to the best of your ability, so they will continue to buy from you, even if those purchases are at a much lower level during these trying times.  But, are you really doing the right things to build your relationships with those key customers and clients that will keep them as customers when the economy finally does rebound and sales volumes really do increase.

 

One thing you should consider doing is working to become deeply integrated into your key customers’ operations.  For example, if you supply components to a manufacturing company, are you working with their purchasing group to optimize value for your customer?  If your customer does a lot of research and development for their product offerings, are you involved as a resource in the engineering and development areas of the company?

 

The purpose of these types of efforts is to become more important and more valuable to each customer.  By becoming better integrated into the fabric of those customers, when a customer has a need you can meet, your company will be the first one they think to ask for assistance with their problems.

 

Get rid of those things that are no longer necessary to the mission of your company.   Every company builds up things which are not necessary to the effectiveness of the core business during low volume times.  Those things that are outside the core business arena, or are no longer used and likely won’t be needed in the future, should be trimmed if doing so will help lower costs, provide more liquid assets (cash) in place of the unused items, or free up space which could be better utilized, either now or when business picks up in the future.

 

Look to the future.  Work hard at trying to predict where your markets will be headed once the economy starts to recover.  Look for niches where your expertise and your customers’ needs match, and brainstorm solutions to their problems. 

 

One approach is to develop new applications for existing products or services.  One company which sold lasers for measurement systems determined that there was a limited but potentially lucrative niche in applying laser measuring systems to parts of wind generator units.  While their original business segments are languishing, this new application is doing quite well.  The potential volume is modest, but for a smaller company, it is a lifeline.

 

Another stratagem is to work hard to anticipate how your company can better be a part of your customers’ futures.  Work to help them survive the slow times, and innovate so that you will be more valuable in the future.  Building these relationships, especially if you can do it while others are husbanding their resources, will very likely enhance your competitive position not only now, but when the economy improves. It should result in your expanded relationships becoming that much better, and closer, for both.

 

M. Dana Baldwin is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. and can be reached at baldwin@cssp.com.

© Copyright 2009 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution
 
 
 
 
 

 

Business Survey Results

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

by Denise A. Harrison, Vice President

This week we asked our readers to fill out a survey concerning current business conditions and their approach to these conditions.  A brief summary of the results: 

  • 40% of survey participants expect revenue to decrease by 20% or more
  • 20% expect revenue to increase by 20%
  • 74% of survey participants cut administrative expenses
  • 60% have had staff reductions
  • 60% are streamlining their processes.
  •