Posts Tagged ‘sales volume’

Strategy Analysis: Expand

Monday, August 16th, 2010

by M. Dana Baldwin, Senior Consultant

Strategic Planning Expert

In strategic planning, there are five basic strategies one may pursue: Expand, Maintain, Contract, Milk or Withdraw.  The most aggressive strategy is Expand.  What does an Expand strategy encompass?

First, let’s define the Expand strategy so we have a basis on which to base discussion.  The dictionary defines expand as: to increase the extent, number, volume, or scope of, to enlarge. We further define an expand strategy as one in which we are growing significantly faster than the market or market segment is growing overall.

To follow an expand strategy, a company must decide to provide the resources which will support the targeted growth rate.  It implies that the company’s growth will absorb much of the real growth of the markets in which the company is competing.  It also implies that the company is willing to take on competitors in order to take market share from them, in addition to absorbing the growth in the market place itself.

Before we select the expand strategy, we need to look in depth at each market segment to see whether it will qualify for an expand strategy.  What are the requirements that a market segment should have in order to be eligible for an expand strategy?

First, we need to be able to have sufficient resources, both people and money, to properly support the strategy to expand our sales volume in each affected market segment.  An expansion strategy can be quite expensive, and will likely absorb a lot of time of some key people in your company.

Second, it should be in a relatively attractive market.  We use a 3 x 3 matrix to demonstrate how attractive a market segment is, and also how strong a competitor we are relative to our own competition.

When you look at the matrix above, you can readily see that the market attractiveness for the suggested strategy of expand is high.  Notice too, that the competitive strength (vertical axis) may range from being a weak competitor/new entry to being a strong, dominant competitor.  Our goal over time is to move our competitive position up the axis to the strongest possible competitive position.

Often it won’t make a lot of sense to expand in a less attractive market segment.  The one exception for this is in a moderately attractive market in which you are the dominant player.  If the potential for a good long term reward is present in a moderately attractive segment where you are a strong number one, then expand should certainly be considered.

Many companies simply do not have the depth of resources – usually people resources – to support too many expand strategies.  Companies need to select the few markets where they want to expend the resources to significantly gain market share.  Focusing resources is paramount to any plan’s success – so your team should not try to expand in all markets.  Rather, we suggest pick the 2-3 that, given the effort, will deliver the most bang for your buck.  We find that if you force the team to pick only 2-3 expand strategies immediately, a few “winners” will be chosen.  This selection of only a few “expands” helps ensure that a team will be successful on the chosen markets.

In conclusion, an expand strategy is a strong bet on your company’s ability to grab market share at a rate higher than the market is expanding, with the goal of increasing your return on investment over time.  This means you will aim to increase your top line sales and bottom line profits at a rate higher than the additional costs you will be incurring in your expansion efforts.

For detailed directions for using the expand strategy in your Simplified Strategic Planning process go to Simplified Strategic Planning book.

M. Dana Baldwin is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. and can be reached at baldwin@cssp.com.

© Copyright 2010 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution.

Is your New Product Development Process Complete?

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

By M. Dana Baldwin, Senior Consultant

Strategic Planning Expert
Strategic Planning Expert

How is your total new product development process performing for your company?  There are a number of elements to consider before answering this question. Elements of the analysis should likely include: Market Intelligence sufficiently equipped to provide well-documented and well-thought-out analyses of potential new products and markets; Development capabilities sufficient to actually develop the new products specified by the market intelligence at the appropriate level of costs, including marketing, selling and distribution costs; production capabilities appropriate to make the products developed; marketing and sales abilities to promote and sell the products; distribution/logistics with the capacities to stock and deliver the products as needed.

First: How well does your market intelligence report on the real needs and preferences of your customers, current and/or targeted?  Effective market intelligence is a necessary element to an effective product development process.  By properly analyzing your customers’ wants and requirements, what your competition is offering and what your company is capable of delivering, market intelligence should help your company focus its product development process on those projects which show the best possibilities for success in the future.  Financial analyses which include the costs of development, manufacturing costs, logistics and distribution costs, selling and marketing costs should be detailed, along with an assessment of appropriate pricing should be completed early in the process with a goal of pursuing those projects with the highest likelihood of success as well as another goal of eliminating those projects which probably won’t reach your profit and sales volume goals. 

Second: Does your new product development (NPD) group possess the tools and knowledge needed to develop the products recommended by marketing?  Do they have time to devote to these new products, or are they already committed to other development projects?  Do you maintain and regularly update your NPD priority list to be sure that your assets are employed in their highest and best use?  At the same time, are you allowing your NPD group to jump from project to project or are they focusing on projects within their capabilities and pursuing them to completion? 

Third: In your NPD process, do you involve production in the development process to be sure that any new product developed can actually be produced on the production equipment your company has?  If your company does not have the capability to manufacture, do you have the outside resources available to provide the productive capacity needed to bring the product to market?  At the same time, do you have the internal ability to effectively work with and monitor the external production of your products to assure timely delivery and appropriate quality and adherence to standards you require? 

Fourth: Do marketing and sales have the capability to promote and sell the products developed?  Do they have the contacts and channels needed to actually bring the product to those who will be buying the newly developed product?  Does marketing have the talent and capacity to promote the new product effectively?  Does sales have the necessary abilities to sell the product to potential users? 

Fifth: Once the product is sold, does distribution/logistics have the ability and capacity to deliver the products as needed?  If you can’t get the product to the buyers, it can’t be successful.  Do you have the distribution network necessary for getting the product to market?  

While this is not an exhaustive checklist, it does point at key elements in any new product development process, which should be included in the overall analysis of whether to proceed or not with a specific project. 

Digging Deeper:  The author recommends referring to Elements of Innovation, a collection of articles by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning consultants (available through www.cssp.com).  See specifically the diagram on page 71 – also found in the article “Innovative Measures” in the Article Archives of www.cssp.com

M. Dana Baldwin is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. and can be reached at baldwin@cssp.com.

© Copyright 2009 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution