Author: Tom Ambler

  • Who Are You? Win with Stories

    By Thomas E. Ambler, Senior Consultant

    This article was previously published in Compass Points September 2007

    Strategic Planning Expert
    Strategic Planning Expert

    What stories do you find yourself repeatedly telling people inside and outside your walls to illustrate “who you are” and what values are key to your organization’s success? Why do you do that? I’ll tell you why. You recognize that people love stories, particularly ones that reflect human struggle and triumph and illustrate lasting values.

    If you are a leader and are not sharing important stories with others, you are missing out on a significant strategic success factor used by many companies you admire and probably your competitors as well. Why are stories really important? They are typically the best means of intentionally communicating your values. The beauty of a story is that you need only remember the “punch line” and you can reconstruct the whole story and easily internalize its meaning. In several of my previous articles (1) I have made the case for how crucial core values are to culture and how crucial culture is to sustainable competitive advantage. Culture influences all aspects of every organizational function–culture is the “glue” of an organization. As noted in the previous articles, culture is tantamount to being a “squishy” strategic competency and can be a cornerstone of a winning strategy.

    Many highly successful organizations rely heavily on stories. Which ones come to your mind? How about Nike, GE, Johnson & Johnson, Wal-Mart, HP, Southwest Airlines, IBM or Fedex? How about the Navy Seals, or The Metropolitan Opera? How about your own organization and some of your customers or suppliers?

    How familiar are you with some of the ins and outs of storytelling? Let’s take a look at some of them.

    Storytelling Principles

    Nike and GE are great examples from which to extract some principles of effective storytelling for shaping winning cultures. Both have:

    • Clearly defined the cultural values they want to promote (perpetuate or change) — (e.g., GE’s “Shared Values,” which committed to such cultural characteristics as continual change, constructive conflict, pervasive doing the right thing, etc.)
    • Identified heroes with heroic stories that communicate values — (e.g., Nike founders Bowerman and Knight and runner Prefontaine with their legendary innovative spirit and commitment to helping athletes and to “Just Doing It”)
    • Icons that symbolize their values– (e.g., GE’s Crotonville Management Development Institute or Nike’s store, which is Nike’s Smithsonian Institute)
    • Processes that fosters effective, organic transmission of the values to all who need to believe in them and adopt them for their shared success–(e.g., GE’s “Work-out” process of management development and modeling by top management or Nike’s high-level, traveling “storytellers, who work with all levels in the company and with value chain partners)


    Additional principles to consider incorporating into your culture-building process include:

    • Heroes: The companies above had ready-made heroes for great stories. Organizations that recognize the importance of culture will not only use existing heroes but will often create heroes to provide the story that conveys the desired cultural trait. Created heroes are often energized to do heroic deeds because they know that they have been placed in positions that are both highly visible and have produced situational heroes in the past. Outlaws and mavericks also make great heroes for stories.
    • Cultural Network: Your leadership team needs to recognize and exploit your organization’s “Cultural Network.” This major part of the amorphous, informal organizational structure that doesn’t show up on your official Organization Chart is a very real and powerful force for exercising influence over the direction of the organization and for promoting cultural characteristics that you want to have stick. There are recognizable roles in most Cultural Networks, including:
      • The Storytellers (share the stories of the heroes, shape the values of new employees, have access to a lot of information)
      • The Priests (guardians of the values and shepherds of the flock, helping in times of personal need)
      • The Whisperer (has the ear of key people)
      • The Administrative Assistants
      • The Spy (a storyteller loyal to you and “watching your back”)
      • The Gossip
      • The Cabal (two or more people, who in a common situation will act in unison)

    Like any networking process cultural networking requires a continuing investment in getting to know your people at multiple levels. (To understand Cultural Networks at a deeper level, consult the book entitled, Corporate Cultures–The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life (2).)

    • Story Development Process: Developing stories is an art worth cultivating. It involves multiple steps:
      • Finding stories–Finding stories that support your values may require a harvesting process with your people that draws out the gemstones from history that represent “who you are” and inform how you do things.
      • Digging into stories–Draw out things like moments of great pride or a person who has had great impact inside or outside of the organization. Multiple stories that illustrate the same value are powerful.
      • Selecting Stories–Generally, you will select stories because they support a goal or espoused value of the organization. For credibility, one must be certain that the stories shared have enough “shadows” of the organization to include people who may be on the margins and to indicate where there are disconnects between reality and desired condition. You need a real-life balance of dark and light stories about the organization.
      • Crafting Stories–Stories need to be concrete, full of details and compelling to engage people at every level.
      • Embodying Stories–Live oral storytelling is far preferable to video, which is passive. It can be enhanced by props, pictures, icons, etc. Live is a full body experience that builds a relationship with trust and makes the stories real and engaging.

    (To delve further into story development consult the book entitled, Wake Me Up When the Data Is Over (3).)

    Stories are a means of branding–internally and externally. Those that have real value for internal culture are often the very same ones that can cement your market brand (e.g., Nordstrom and the legendary return of tires or 3M and the serendipitous development of Post-Its). Know your stories, manage your stories and milk your stories.

    Good or bad, your organization will have a culture and it will have its values. They can either (a) be clearly understood and fostered to become a big-time, winning strength or (b) they can be fuzzy and confused and dilute your effectiveness. It’s your choice–winning cultures don’t happen by accident. They are built, transformed and sustained by focusing energy and continual commitment, much of it through stories. Are you winning with yours?

    References:
    1. T. E. Ambler, “The Strategic Value of Values,” Compass Points (CSSP’s Quarterly Newsletter); “Know Thyself–Culture in Strategic Management,” Course and Direction(CSSP’s E-zine); “Winning the High Way–Organizational Success by the Golden Rule,”Course and Direction (CSSP’s E-zine) (all available free from the Article Archives in the Tools and Resources section of www.cssp.com)
    2. Terrence E. Deal and Allan A. Kennedy, Corporate Cultures–The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, (Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing, 2000)
    3. Lori L. Silverman, Wake Me Up When the Data Is Over–How Organizations Use Stories to Drive Results, (San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass, 2006)

    For more information on how to take your strategic planning to the next level please listen to our webinar: Why Isn’t My Strategic Planning Working?

    © Copyright 2011 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution.

    Tom Ambler is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. He can be reached by email at ambler@cssp.com

  • Innovation and Execution — A Critical Strategic Balance

    By Thomas E. Ambler, Senior Consultant

    Strategic Planning Expert
    Strategic Planning Expert

    Reprinted from Compass Points January 2008

    Balancing internal and external forces that fight one another and create tension is at the very heart of strategic management. One of the most familiar and least pleasurable duties of a CEO is the role of “herding cats” in an effort to bring common direction to a management team whose jobs by nature tug in different directions and compete for common, limited resources. Nowhere is this conflict more pronounced than where short-term organizational health, aka “Execution” or operational effectiveness, inevitably meets up with long-term organizational rejuvenation, aka “Innovation”.

    Most companies seek to gain competitive advantage by differentiating their products and services and/or their business model. This occurs through product and process technology innovation (R&D) and value innovation (e.g., finding a “Blue Ocean”¹). If your company is attempting to be highly innovative, you feel the dynamic tension and recognize that your organization is clearly composed of contradictory parts, much like the Duckbilled Platypus.

    Here is its description:
    “The platypus has a flat, rubbery bill, no teeth and webbed feet–like a duck. Yet it has a furry body and beaver-like tail, and nurses its young like a mammal. It walks with a lizard gait and lays leathery eggs like a reptile. And the male can use venomous hind-leg spurs to strike like a snake.”

    Here is a creature that breaks all of the rules of birds, mammals or reptiles. Yet, it functions just fine for what it is intended to be and do. So, how would you characterize your company? Is it like a platypus or does it operate more like a pure bird, mammal or reptile?

    Many companies define themselves as purely “bird, mammal or reptile” and win in the short term by tuning themselves to run like a top. They measure everything, benchmark their operation against world-class organizations and have an exceptional “Execution Machine”. Only startup companies define their mission to be strictly Innovation. Most companies, on the other hand, are some combination of Execution Machines and Innovators and have to deal with the “messiness” of two fundamentally incompatible worlds. Typically, the Execution Machine has the upper hand and the company’s Goals (e.g., urgent short-term financial results), means of conveying personal Status and rewards, Structure of power, systems and communication flow, and view and handling of Failure are designed primarily for Execution and not Innovation. This appears to have occurred even within 3M, historically the ultimate example in innovation, through its forced institution of Six Sigma as the centerpiece of corporate culture.

    To counter this normal bias toward Execution and avoid treating Innovation as a stepchild, Thomas Kuczmarski² has developed an entire Innovation process, of which the following Creed is a key element:

    The Innovation Creed for Top Managers–A 15-Point Innovation Checklist
    1. I believe innovative new products and services are integral to my company’s future success.
    2. I believe I control the future success of innovation for my company.
    3. I believe new-to-the-world products can be our most valued currency.
    4. I believe that internal innovation will yield greater returns than equally risky acquisitions.
    5. I believe long-term investments in innovation will yield profitable returns if managed correctly.
    6. I believe innovation will pay for itself and generate high returns if a balanced new products portfolio is maintained.
    7. I believe that the quantity of new products is as important as their quality.
    8. I believe new solutions to existing problems will provide big-hit new product opportunities.
    9. I believe that I am one of the biggest assets or most impenetrable barriers that can make or break innovation.
    10. I believe that an effective innovation mindset can motivate my employees to perform better and be more productive.
    11. I believe that the death or success of innovation lies directly in my hands.
    12. I believe that measuring return on innovation is as important as measuring return on equity.
    13. I believe that failure is an intrinsic component of innovation, and I accept that.
    14. I believe that maintaining a positive, proactive, and buoyant attitude about innovation is critical for morale.
    15. I believe innovation should be one of my top five priorities and remain on my to-do list.

    Check out your beliefs relative to this list. If you can’t say, “yes”, to at least 10 of the beliefs, you are likely a barrier to achieving high levels of innovation. Ideally, the entire top management team will subscribe and live out this creed in a unified manner. But, of course, it is the consistent, sustained, proactive commitment by the CEO that is absolutely crucial for the success of Innovation in all companies.

    Short and long-term success of your company is all about balance and trade-offs. Dynamically balancing the tension between Execution and Innovation through wise creation and management of goals, personal status, power structure and handling of failure lead to successful strategy.

    References 1. W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne, Blue Ocean Strategy, (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2005) 2. Thomas D. Kuczmarski, Innovation: Leadership Strategies for the Competitive Edge, (Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books/American Marketing Association, 1995)

    For more information on how to take your strategic planning to the next level please listen to our webinar: Why Isn’t My Strategic Planning Working?

    © Copyright 2011 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution.

    Tom Ambler is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. He can be reached by email at ambler@cssp.com

  • Kodak’s Big Bet: “To Be or Not To Be”

    By Thomas E. Ambler, Senior Consultant

    Strategic Planning Expert
    Strategic Planning Expert

    Reprinted from Course & Direction May 2007

    Since the millennium Eastman Kodak Co. has been under attack by a Killer App known as Digital Imaging. In the last several years it has suffered the loss of much of its historical core business (as much as 20% per year) and has had to seek a way to milk its past while reinventing itself as a Digital Imaging company. On February 6, 2007 CEO Perez announced the immediate launch of Kodak’s reinvented inkjet printer and business model surrounding it as means of reinventing Kodak. In its issue Business Week describes the Kodak situation in an excellent and captivating article entitled “Kodak’s Moment of Truth”.

    Here is a case of a single high risk opportunity that is likely to be instrumental in transforming a major company. Students of business love to sink their teeth into this kind of case and, with incredible incisiveness based on 20/20 hindsight, glean the kernels of wisdom to share with their less learned siblings. In the real world top management teams don’t get to make their decisions based on 20/20 hindsight. You are likely so much in the thick of things that you suffer some pangs of conscience about separating yourself from operations for even a few days to consider where to take the company in the future (aka Strategic Planning). Naturally, you want to make the most of your time, particularly when considering new opportunities. One of the ways to do that is to subject your major opportunities to a screening tool that forces analysis of the factors that will make it succeed or fail  .Simplified Strategic Planning calls this tool a “Market Based Opportunity Screening Worksheet”.

    Let’s step back to 2003 and put ourselves in the shoes of Antonio Perez and his senior management team as they contemplate this pivotal opportunity in the face of an abysmal future. (This happens to be an opportunity for which we can sufficiently visualize the future ahead of time without stooping to 20/20 hindsight and see where the opportunity screening would take us.) You appointed me to complete the Screening Worksheet for the Strategic Planning Team and make my recommendations. Now it is time for you to review my work, challenge my strategic thinking and reach your own conclusions.

    Click here for the complete Market Based Opportunity Screening Worksheet.

    You may want to read the Business Week article anyway and see just how well the screening draws out the information needed to make at least a tentative decision to proceed or not with an opportunity. Having gone through the screening exercise, I believe, with all of the objectivity I can muster, that it ferrets out and presents the pertinent information every bit as well as a Business Week senior writer. Here is yet another confirmation that Simplified Strategic Planning has the power to guide top leaders through the bewildering maze of alternative directions.

    How about Kodak’s decision to proceed forward? What is your assessment of this new inkjet offering with its disruptive business model. Will it be sufficient “to be or not to be” the silver bullet that permits Kodak “to be or not to be” as much a winner in the future as it was in the past? Will you root for them? Will you buy their stock? Won’t it be fun in several years to engage in 20/20 hindsight and see how smart we were when we wore the shoes of the Kodak team?

    *** Now that it is several years after this article was first published, please “engage in 20/20 hindsight” and comment on this blog.

    Information Sources:

    1. Steve Hamm, 2007, “Kodak’s Moment of Truth,” Business Week, February 19
    2. Kodak Press Release, February 6, 2007, “Kodak Revolutionizes the Inkjet Industry,”www.kodak.com
    3. MLPF&S (Merrill Lynch) Research Report, February 13, 2007, “Eastman Kodak Co.–Looking Past the Restructuring”
    4. Morningstar Research Report, February 13, 2007, “Eastman Kodak–Kodak Enters Inkjet Printer Market”
    5. Ford Equity Research Report (BNY Jaywalk), March 2, 2007, “Eastman Kodak”

    Tom Ambler is a Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached by email at ambler@cssp.com

    © Copyright 2014 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution.