Category: Strategy Implementation

  • Getting Everything Done

    By Robert W. Bradford, President & CEO

    Strategic Planning Expert
    Robert W. Bradford

    One of the sticky problems most people face in strategic planning is execution.  Over 80% of executives we survey in our seminars cite strategy implementation as their biggest issue with strategic planning.  Meeting strategic objectives is difficult enough that many companies bypass this part of the strategy process and focus most of their effort on key performance metrics.  While performance metrics – such as Balanced Scorecard – can play a useful role in implementing strategy, they tend to fall short in the areas of true strategic change and innovation.  This is because good strategies – for many companies – may involve forays into new technologies, markets and processes.

    In such situations, it can be difficult, if not impossible, to manage change through the use of metrics – especially since the management team, while familiar with their current operational metrics, may have little experience with understanding the numbers in new areas.  A good example of this can be seen in the transition from using print and broadcast advertising to advertising using SEO and social networks.  An experienced hand at print advertising could, indeed, make good inroads in digital marketing, but the numbers will at first seem meaningless – and then, possibly, much too large or small.  This is because the nature of interaction changes when you make such a big strategic shift – and the value of the eyeballs you may be accessing with your advertising can change dramatically based upon how they are targeted.  The metrics of the one world simply don’t help manage the metrics of the other, except at a very basic accounting level.

    Getting real strategic objectives completed, then, is rarely a matter of moving the needle on a metric.  It’s much more likely to be a learning activity where the objective is simply knowing how to do the things needed – and then, ideally defining a path to mastery.

    Without question, the greatest tools for getting this kind of objective done are project-based, and tend to have three things in common:

    1. Sound objective setting
    2. Realistic resource allocation
    3. Routine progress review

    A process that assures a simple, but robust approach to these things will greatly enhance real strategic activity directed towards your objectives.  How does your process stack up?

    To learn ways to take your strategic planning to the next level please listen to our webinar:  Why my strategic planning isn’t working.

    Robert Bradford is President/CEO of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached at rbradford@cssp.com.

    © Copyright 2017 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution

  • Jump Starting Good Opportunity Ideas

    Note: This article was originally printed in Compass Points November 2006

    By Thomas E. Ambler, Senior Consultant

    No one knows better than you that your markets are not what they used to be. They are undergoing an accelerating shift on what and where customers place value and who in the supply chain makes the best profits. Your ”sweet spot” isn’t nearly as sweet as it was not all that long ago. What you considered ”good business” yesterday has lost much of its glitter. As a result, you seek a dynamically changing portfolio of new market opportunities that will assure that you transform today’s Core Business into the best possible Core Business for tomorrow.

    You want to pursue these Market Opportunities to the point where you can make a wise go/no go decision. The continual search for new Market Opportunities that are ”good business” consists of two distinct phases as diagrammed in Figure 1 below—the Opportunity Idea Generation Phase and the Opportunity Development Phase.

    Both Phases require Opportunity Screening.  Business literature related to innovation offers a number of Opportunity Screening devices, but none are better than the general-purpose Market Opportunity Screen taken from our Simplified Strategic Planning process1. Based on sound new product/market launch research by MSU Professor Frank Bacon, it can be used as the screen for go/no go decisions at all stages in the development of an opportunity.

    Once an opportunity begins to take structure in Phase 2, we know pretty well how to deal with it. The bigger challenge lies in Phase 1. How do we generate ideas for ”good business” in the first place?

    Generation of ”good” opportunity ideas requires instituting a systematic, common sense process that ferrets out possibilities, a culture that fosters a willingness to fail, a recruiting method that seeks curious, intelligent, open-minded associates and a work ethic that just won’t stop.

    Fundamentally, a ”good” opportunity is one that (a) fits with who you want to become as a company, (b) involves an attractive market and (c) takes advantage of a competitive opening.

    Figure 2 below, the OPPORTUNITY IDEA GENERATION CHECKLIST, is a very useful checklist of mind joggers and idea starters for Market Opportunities. It incorporates the three ”good” opportunity criteria and is derived primarily from the Market Opportunity Screening Worksheet used in the Simplified Strategic Planning Process.

    What other idea starters have you found useful? Share them on the author’s blog site, http://strategy–thehighroad.blogspot.com or email them to ambler@cssp.com.

    Jump-start your opportunity brainstorming sessions. Try out some of these idea starters.  If you want even more idea starters, take a look at the references below.  May you generate lots of Good Ideas that lead to Great Execution!

    References
    1. Robert W. Bradford and J. Peter Duncan with Brian Tarcy, Simplified Strategic Planning: A No-Nonsense Guide For Busy People Who Want Results Fast, (Worcester, MA: Chandler House Press, 2000)

    2. T. E. Ambler, ”The Pursuit of Good Business,” Compass Points (October 2003)(available from the Article Archives of www.strategyletter.com)

    For information on how to take your strategic planning to the next level, please listen to our webinar: Why Isn’t My Strategic Planning Working?

    © Copyright 2016 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution.

    Tom Ambler is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. He can be reached by email at ambler@cssp.com

  • Implementation Advantage – Part 5

    We are discussing the root causes of poor implementation in a series of posts.  Part 5 covers the fifth root cause of poor implementation.

    The plan attempts too much too quickly

    This is probably the second most common issue, and, as we said, sometimes difficult to distinguish from issue 3 (The implementation is given insufficient resources). As managers, and as teams, we all seem to have eyes that are much bigger than our stomachs. If five objectives are good, ten must be better, right?

    Well, wrong… ten objectives are almost always worse, from an implementation perspective, than

    Strategic Planning Expert Robert W. Bradford
    Strategic Planning Expert
    Robert W. Bradford

    five. There are two key reasons for this. First, we psychologically tend to focus more on items when they are limited in quantity. Everyone in your company is likely to know your company’s objectives if you only have four or five. If you have forty-two (we call this a “laundry list”), chances are no one will know most of them, and few will even care. This is not because your employees are bad – rather, it’s because it’s not humanly possible for a group of people to remember and properly prioritize forty-two objectives.

    The solution for this issue is simple, but often difficult. Don’t let yourself tackle more objectives than you can handle. If you had trouble with nine last year, try seven this year. In our experience, implementation is optimized somewhere between five and ten objectives, depending on the organization, its culture and resources.

    In the past few posts, we have discussed just a few of the most common implementation issues we run into in our work as strategy consultants, assisting companies like your own in strategic planning. It’s not exhaustive, but hopefully, as you get out your plans for this year, you will think about taking some of the steps outlined here to improve your implementation.

    Is your company having a hard time implementing your strategic plan?  Let us know how you are dealing with it – or, better yet, attend our amazing, data-driven workshop on Simplified Strategic Planning to learn how to develop and implement your strategic plan.  Our highly acclaimed Simplified Strategic Planning approach has helped many hundreds of organizations improve their strategies and bottom line results with effective, actionable strategies.  Please listen to our webinar:  Why my strategic planning isn’t working.

    Robert Bradford is President/CEO of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached at rbradford@cssp.com.

    © Copyright 2016 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution

  • Implementation Advantage – Part 4

    By Robert W. Bradford, President & CEO

    Note: This article was originally posted in Compass Points in May 2006.  We are discussing the root causes of poor implementation in a series of posts.  Part 4 covers the fourth root cause of poor implementation.

    Strategic Planning Expert Robert W. Bradford
    Strategic Planning Expert
    Robert W. Bradford

    Managers change their objectives too quickly

    In some companies, the main strategy implementation amounts to a kind of corporate “short attention span”.  Many of these companies don’t make much headway in their strategy implementation because they are never heading in one direction long enough for the strategy to pick up steam.

    A common symptom of this implementation issue is a company that seems to be perpetually in the middle of dramatic changes. In a company with a sound, consistent strategy, change is occurring, but change tends to flow around the strategy, because the strategy represents a stable, unchanging reality, such as “Starbucks customers like good coffee in a good environment”.

    Another symptom is the classic “flavor of the month” syndrome, where the company shifts direction every month or two based upon the viewpoint of the management guru that is currently in favor with the top executives. This is a dangerous problem, as many of today’s management gurus espouse strategic outlooks that are diametrically opposed. For example, “The Experience Economy” espouses a strong, service-centered specialty strategy, while “Nuts!” centers on a focused commodity strategy. You might succeed in shoehorning both of these outlooks into one company, but you are just as likely to end up with a train wreck.

    The annual planning process, and strict discipline around that process, is the best antidote we know to “short attention span”. The key here is to make sure you have sound strategic reasons for every change you make in your objectives (and no, “there’s a lot of money to be made” is NOT a sound strategic reason). Likewise, test every change against the wisdom that is inherent in your own strategy. If it fits, great – but when it doesn’t, be very wary of making changes because of small, temporary changes in your marketplace or (worse) your reading list.

    In the upcoming weeks, we will discuss other root causes of poor implementation.

    Is your company having a hard time implementing your strategic plan?  Let us know how you are dealing with it – or, better yet, attend our amazing, data-driven workshop on Simplified Strategic Planning to learn how to develop and implement your strategic plan.  Our highly acclaimed Simplified Strategic Planning approach has helped many hundreds of organizations improve their strategies and bottom line results with effective, actionable strategies.  Please listen to our webinar:  Why my strategic planning isn’t working.

    Robert Bradford is President/CEO of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached at rbradford@cssp.com.

    © Copyright 2016 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution

  • Implementation Advantage – Part 3

    By Robert W. Bradford, President & CEO

    Note: This article was originally posted in Compass Points in May 2006.  We are discussing the root causes of poor implementation in a series of posts.  Part 3 covers the third root cause of poor implementation.

    Strategic Planning Expert Robert W. Bradford
    Strategic Planning Expert
    Robert W. Bradford

    The implementation lacks follow-through

    Sometimes, we see companies that do a decent job of linking their strategies to objectives and action plans, but still lose steam in the implementation part of the planning cycle. A lack of follow-through is one of the most common causes of this “petering out”.

    The best indication of poor follow-through is action plans that haven’t been updated since the plan was completed, or perhaps a month or two afterwards. The team set up their implementation plans with good intentions, but then dropped the ball as more urgent activities drove strategy implementation out of their minds. This is common because the very best strategies are never urgent – they are undertaken well ahead of time, because time and money can usually be traded off in strategy implementation. Companies that choose to spend time when they have it – even when the strategic initiative is not urgent – are almost always more efficient.

    To remedy the lack of follow-through requires commitment from the highest level of the management team. If the owner, president, or CEO insists upon a serious, routine periodic review of progress on strategy implementation, it is highly unlikely that your company will drop the ball. Practically speaking, this means you must keep to the monthly monitoring process that we outline in the Simplified Strategic Planning seminar and manual.

    In the upcoming weeks, we will discuss other root causes of poor implementation.

    Is your company having a hard time implementing your strategic plan?  Let us know how you are dealing with it – or, better yet, attend our amazing, data-driven workshop on Simplified Strategic Planning to learn how to develop and implement your strategic plan.  Our highly acclaimed Simplified Strategic Planning approach has helped many hundreds of organizations improve their strategies and bottom line results with effective, actionable strategies.  Please listen to our webinar:  Why my strategic planning isn’t working.

    Robert Bradford is President/CEO of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached at rbradford@cssp.com.

    © Copyright 2016 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution

  • Implementation Advantage – Part 2

    By Robert W. Bradford, President & CEO

    Note: This article was originally posted in Compass Points in May 2006.  We are discussing the root causes of poor implementation in a series of posts.  Part 2 covers the second root cause of poor implementation.

    Strategic Planning Expert Robert W. Bradford
    Strategic Planning Expert
    Robert W. Bradford

    The implementation lacks follow-through

    Sometimes, we see companies that do a decent job of linking their strategies to objectives and action plans, but still lose steam in the implementation part of the planning cycle. A lack of follow-through is one of the most common causes of this “petering out”.

    The best indication of poor follow-through is action plans that haven’t been updated since the plan was completed, or perhaps a month or two afterwards. The team set up their implementation plans with good intentions, but then dropped the ball as more urgent activities drove strategy implementation out of their minds. This is common because the very best strategies are never urgent – they are undertaken well ahead of time, because time and money can usually be traded off in strategy implementation. Companies that choose to spend time when they have it – even when the strategic initiative is not urgent – are almost always more efficient.

    To remedy the lack of follow-through requires commitment from the highest level of the management team. If the owner, president, or CEO insists upon a serious, routine periodic review of progress on strategy implementation, it is highly unlikely that your company will drop the ball. Practically speaking, this means you must keep to the monthly monitoring process that we outline in the Simplified Strategic Planning seminar and manual.

    In the upcoming weeks, we will discuss other root causes of poor implementation.

    Is your company having a hard time implementing your strategic plan?  Let us know how you are dealing with it – or, better yet, attend our amazing, data-driven workshop on Simplified Strategic Planning to learn how to develop and implement your strategic plan.  Our highly acclaimed Simplified Strategic Planning approach has helped many hundreds of organizations improve their strategies and bottom line results with effective, actionable strategies.  Please listen to our webinar:  Why my strategic planning isn’t working.

    Robert Bradford is President/CEO of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached at rbradford@cssp.com.

    © Copyright 2016 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution

  • Implementation Advantage – Part 1

     

    Note: This article was originally posted in Compass Points in May 2006.  Part 1 introduces the article and the first root cause of poor implementation.

    Strategic Planning Expert Robert W. Bradford
    Strategic Planning Expert
    Robert W. Bradford

    In our strategic planning work, we often work with companies who have tried strategic planning before. Almost inevitably, the companies we meet were disappointed in the results they got before using Simplified Strategic Planning. While some of these disappointments can be attributed to poor strategy or process issues, many – perhaps a third – were disappointed because the plan failed to lead to good implementation of the strategy.

    This is a shame, because your management team puts some of its best thinking into your strategic plans. Often, the team is quite excited about the vision portrayed by your strategies. So, how is it that strategic plans are so often poorly implemented?

    In our experience, there are five main root causes of poor implementation. Some of these are very closely linked to each other – that is, it’s common to see pairs of this issue operating in tandem. But, ultimately, each of these items, by itself, can torpedo your strategy implementation:

    1. The plan is not linked to implementation
    2. The implementation lacks follow-through
    3. The implementation is given insufficient resources
    4. Managers change their objectives too quickly
    5. The plan attempts too much too quickly

    Let’s examine each of these issues, and how to mitigate its negative effects on strategy implementation at your company.

    1. The plan is not linked to implementation

    This one is unfortunately, very common. In many cases, the plan’s issues can be traced back to a consultant who wanted to sell each step of the implementation as a separate service, but sometimes, it arises from sheer ignorance of the pitfalls of strategic planning. Many people who attempt strategic planning for the first time assume that once the strategies are written down, the organization has a plan. In a sense, this is true – written strategies are, technically, a plan. Writing your vision down, however, doesn’t guarantee that it will come to pass. If it did, we’d all be living in the utopia of the mission statements most of us labored over in the 1980s and 1990s.

    The clearest symptom that a plan isn’t linked to implementation is an absence of clear, measurable objectives and related action plans that define, at a fairly low level, who is going to do what, when, how much it will cost and when it will happen. Sometimes this happens when the process stops after identifying strategies and goals, and sometimes the objectives are set, but no action plans are created (often because there are just too many objectives).

    The simplest remedy for this problem, of course, is to follow a process that drives implementation by progressing beyond strategies and goals to measurable objectives and appropriate strategic-level action plans. Yes, this takes more time than the cheap and cheerful one- or two-day retreat that a lot of companies seem to like, but it has such a profound impact on the results generated by the plan that it is time well spent.

    In the upcoming weeks, we will discuss other root causes of poor implementation.

    Is your company having a hard time implementing your strategic plan?  Let us know how you are dealing with it – or, better yet, attend our amazing, data-driven workshop on Simplified Strategic Planning to learn how to develop and implement your strategic plan.  Our highly acclaimed Simplified Strategic Planning approach has helped many hundreds of organizations improve their strategies and bottom line results with effective, actionable strategies.  Please listen to our webinar:  Why my strategic planning isn’t working.

    Robert Bradford is President/CEO of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached at rbradford@cssp.com.
    © Copyright 2016 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution
  • Communicating Your Strategic Plan With Employees – Part Two

     

    Strategic Planning Expert Robert W. Bradford
    Strategic Planning Expert
    Robert W. Bradford

    This article was originally posted in Course and Direction  this is Part Two of that article.

    It’s critically important that employees understand your strategy. Employees who understand your strategy will be able to make better day-to-day decisions that will support your vision. But, while most of us understand this – at least intellectually – we often have difficulty effectively communicating our strategies to people outside of the strategic planning team. This may be especially difficult if you feel that parts of your strategy are sensitive and should not be shared with people outside of your management team. In addition, it may be undesirable to load employees with the task of thoroughly understanding all of your strategic planning documents when many employees only touch on one small operational area. How can we reconcile these difficulties?   In Part One of this article, we covered three ways to better communicate your strategy.

    Here are a few additional tips that will help you communicate your strategy more effectively:

    1. Use a few defined categories:You will lose a little detail by having five market segments rather than ten. What you will gain is a framework that your employees can and will remember – which means they are more likely to use it in their day-to-day thinking, as well. Remember, one of the key reasons why you are communicating your strategy with your employees is that they will, in fact, have to support it with their actions. Employees who can’t remember your strategy because it is too complex certainly will have difficulty supporting your strategy.
    2. Say what you don’t do:Don’t give a lengthy list of good intentions. Instead of defining strategy in terms of the obvious, cut to the chase and let your people know the things your company isn’t going to do. It may be harder to come up with, but it will give a much clearer sense of your strategy, faster. Many companies use the “good intention laundry list” to avoid admitting that they haven’t made any real decisions – and their employees know it. It’s a very good idea to let your people know your strategic focus in clear, unambiguous language.
    3. Make the difference between you and your competitors clear:If your strategy doesn’t set you apart from the competition, it won’t work – so make sure your employees understand how they can help put some teeth into your differentiation. This is especially important for your people in sales. Knowing that your company has clear points of distinction from competitors will also help your employees to be proud of who you are.
    4. Limit yourself:Don’t try to list everything you can do or should do – define your strategy in terms of a simple vision with a limited number of objectives. Companies that set themselves more than 10 objectives tend to do far worse on implementation, and in fact many companies should have only five or six objectives. Not only won’t you be in danger of running out of things to do – you are also unlikely to ever hear the complaint that your strategy was too clear.
    5. Make objectives concrete and measurable:Vague objectives may make your management team comfortable by giving them “wiggle room”, but concrete, measurable objectives with deadline dates are better for quickly clarifying the results you are seeking as well as who is accountable. If you have difficulty with this, try to identify a measurable objective that is close to the half-way point. By all means, make your objectives a bit of a stretch, but leave your employees feeling confident that you will, in fact, achieve most – if not all – of the objectives you are communicating with them.

    In our experience, companies that share their strategy with their employees get far greater alignment with their vision. This makes implementation much easier, and helps to give your vision a life of its own. If you want to get all of your employees – and not just your planning team – helping to move your vision forward, try communicating your strategy with them this week!

    If your company needs to improve its strategies, contact us for great, experienced leadership through the strategy development process.  Our highly acclaimed Simplified Strategic Planning approach has helped many hundreds of organizations improve their strategies and bottom line results with effective, actionable strategies.  Please listen to our webinar:  Why my strategic planning isn’t working.

    Robert Bradford is President/CEO of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached at rbradford@cssp.com.
    © Copyright 2015 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution
  • Communicating Your Strategic Plan With Employees-Part One

     

    This article was originally posted in Course and Direction, and this is Part One of that article.

    It’s critically important that employees understand your strategy. Employees who understand your strategy will be able to make better day-to-day decisions that will support your vision. But, while most of us understand this – at least intellectually – we often have difficulty effectively communicating our strategies to people outside of the strategic planning team. This may be especially difficult if you feel that parts of your strategy are sensitive and should not be shared with people outside of your management team. In addition, it may be undesirable to load employees with the task of thoroughly understanding all of your strategic planning documents when many employees only touch on one small operational area. How can we reconcile these difficulties?

    First, you should probably have a separate vehicle for communicating your strategy. Handing out photocopies of your strategic planning binder will not achieve the effect you desire. Definitely prepare a separate document for communicating your strategy to employees. There are several reasons why this is a good idea. First, a strategy communication document can be written expressly for your employee base, using language that they will understand. Second, such a document can be structured around communications effectiveness, rather than being structured around the strategy or implementation process. Finally, it is much easier to police a short strategy communication document for sensitive data that you may not want to share with others – especially competitors.

    The second way of communicating your strategy more effectively is to use something short and to-the-point, since many employees won’t want to spend a lot of time reading about your vision. Our clients have found that a one-sheet summary combined with a short (15-30 minute) informational meeting with managers is most effective vehicle for communicating the outcome of your strategic planning meetings. The more quickly and easily employees can digest – and understand – your strategy, the more likely they are to do so, and take it to heart. We strongly recommend the judicious use of bullet points and, where appropriate, graphics, to get your strategic vision across as succinctly as possible.

    Thirdly, you should “sanitize” your communication document. This isn’t as hard as it sounds – you simply need to look at everything you might share with employees and ask “will it hurt us if other people know this?” Obviously, this is much easier if you are using a separate document for communicating your strategy. One of the very interesting things we notice about “sanitized” strategy documents is that they still convey a strong sense of the company’s strategic competency. This is because real strategic competency is a very good example of something that’s unlikely to hurt you if shared. So go ahead and share your competencies – if they are real. On the other hand, you will want to be very careful about the weaknesses your company has that are discussed in such a document. The reason for this is twofold: first, you don’t want employees focusing too heavily on weaknesses for a host of reasons, and second, you don’t want to tip your hand on any internal issues that you are addressing before you have tackled them. A savvy competitor can make a lot of hay from any weaknesses you acknowledge in public, so make sure that any communication that includes weaknesses focuses on strategically useful weaknesses rather than issues you intend to address and possibly fix in the future.

    If your company needs to improve its strategies, contact us for great, experienced leadership through the strategy development process.  Our highly acclaimed Simplified Strategic Planning approach has helped many hundreds of organizations improve their strategies and bottom line results with effective, actionable strategies.  Please listen to our webinar:  Why my strategic planning isn’t working.

    Robert Bradford is President/CEO of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached at rbradford@cssp.com.
                                            Strategic Planning Expert Robert W. Bradford
    © Copyright 2015 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution
  • When Your Strategic Plan Execution Stalls

    By M. Dana Baldwin, Senior Consultant

    Strategic Planning Expert
    Strategic Planning Expert

    When your team gets so busy they can’t put in the time to continue their responsibilities to execute their parts of your strategic plan, what do you do?  No surprise, it is up to you to change the atmosphere in which they are working to get them back on task.  What needs to happen?

    It is up to you to reinvigorate the team.  One thing to do is to be sure you are meeting at least once a month to review your progress on the strategic plan and each of your action plans.  Accept no excuses for missing this meeting, as this sends the message that the update session is important to you and to your team members.  At this meeting, go over the strategies you have selected for each of your core business segments to be sure that everyone understands what is expected and who is to do each part.  Review your action plans, step by step, to reinforce to the team that it is imperative that steps be accomplished as each person committed to do when you originally scheduled the action plans at the tail end of your strategy development sessions.

    Find out what is preventing or hampering the execution of the various items people should be addressing.  Did people overcommit, did they promise time to carry out their action steps which they can no longer deliver?  You need to dive deeply enough into the problems they have to determine what is really happening.  Have their responsibilities changed since the ending of the formal planning sessions?  Have they lost someone in their departments, so their work load has increased since the process started?

    Once you have worked out the details of why things aren’t moving, you and each team member need to determine what to do about the roadblocks.  Can responsibilities be spread over more people, so that time may be made available to work at the strategic level?  Are there functions which are being performed today which no longer need to be done?  As technology changes, it is possible that certain operations which have been done historically no longer need to be done, or at least could be done at a reduced level, or done by others who are not involved in carrying out strategic initiatives.

    The most important factor, I believe, is that you need to set a good example.  You need to hold scheduled meetings to review progress, address any problems your team members may have, and to hold people accountable for meeting their commitments.  You also need to complete your own assignments on time, to set the tone for holding others accountable.

    If you have problems with your execution, we can help.  Give me a call at 616-575-3193 or email me at baldwin@cssp.com.  We also have our booklet: Alignment for Implementation, which may help you with getting your people to make your strategies work.  Contact me to get a copy.

    M. Dana Baldwin is a Senior Consultant with Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. He can be reached by email at: baldwin@cssp.com

    © Copyright 2015 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution.

  • Why Most Strategic Plans Don’t Work

    By Robert W. Bradford, President and CEO

    Strategic Planning Expert Robert W. Bradford
    Strategic Planning Expert
    Robert W. Bradford

    Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve had some interesting conversations with a client about what we do in strategic planning.  You see, there are lots of approaches to strategic planning – some of which work – but we do something just a bit differently than most.  Many people like to work within the frameworks that great thinkers like Peter Drucker and Michael Porter have added to the discipline – and those are wonderful.  But, while frameworks help with strategic thinking, they aren’t enough to cause strategic thinking.  What this means is that many, many companies have a “strategic plan” that looks like it should have good strategy in it – but it does not.  You may have a SWOT analysis, you may have looked at your competency, and you may have your mission, vision and values identified, but if you don’t have real strategic thinking, you are just using up time and paper on your plan.

    So, what do we do differently?  In Simplified Strategic Planning, we certainly cover the useful bits you would expect.  But beyond that, we push you past your comfort zone into the real data, the real ways to test your ideas, and real results.  And that’s the thing I see missing in many strategic plans – reality.  A plan is just a piece of paper until you translate it into action, and most models of strategic planning miss this critical element entirely.  How do you turn your plan into reality?  When you encounter obstacles, how do you handle them?

    In our practice with companies, we consider ourselves about two thirds done when we have set our strategy, goals and objectives.  Over the past 34 years, we have tested and tweaked a practical system for managing strategy execution with thousands of companies, constantly changing the approach to get better results.  Yet over that time, the most commonly skipped parts of the process are those steps we’ve developed specifically to get better strategy implementation.  The execution process is not sexy, it’s not full of impressive buzzwords – but it works.  Do you pay attention to execution in your company?  Could it be the reason your plans don’t lead to the results you want?

    For more information on how to execute your strategic plan, please listen to our webinar: Strategic Execution: Path to Profitability.

    Robert Bradford is President/CEO of the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc.  He can be reached at rbradford@cssp.com.
    © Copyright 2015 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution
  • Strategic Planning: Are Your Decisions Based on Facts or Opinions?

    By Denise Harrison, Senior Consultant

    Strategic Planning Expert
    Strategic Planning Expert

    Many people return from a strategic planning retreat frustrated, often asking: Were we really concentrating on what is important or were we focusing on what was “top of mind”?  Did we make the right decisions or were we swayed by the most persuasive person?

    A Better Way to Make Decisions: Thoughtful Consideration Based on Research

    One way to prevent making decisions based on opinions and “top of mind” thinking would be to split your strategic planning process into three steps:

    1. Situation Analysis and Research Identification
    2. Strategic Formulation (based on the above research)
    3. Implementation – Turning Strategy into Action

    Critically, Step 1 starts your strategic planning process off on solid footing, focusing on the current situation and identifying the important areas of research.  These should include:

    • Current business segments: Are we positioned to meet their future needs? How are we differentiated?
    • Competition: What are they up to? How are they positioned in the market?
    • Other considerations that can change the competitive landscape: technology, suppliers, economy and regulations?
    • Opportunities: What are they?  What is each one’s potential?  What is the downside risk?

    Taking the time to research these topics and any others that your team deems worthy of research before the strategy formulation session allows for better decisions in which all team members are equipped to participate.  It will enable your team to develop a strategy that will really differentiate you from the competition and set you on the path for future success.

    What else?

    Another important component of the research phase is to have the research collected in a consistent format.  Having a template for the business segment, competitor and opportunity research is particularly important.  This consistent format allows you to compare each topic given the same information rather than miscellaneous bits and pieces pulled together to present the researcher’s thoughts in a favorable light.  This consistency allows for rigorous discussion of where to expend your company’s resources in order to achieve the best possible benefit.

    If you would like to know how to make your strategic planning sessions more fact-based please contact me at harrison@cssp.com.

    For more information on how to take your strategic planning to the next level please listen to our webinar: Why Isn’t My Strategic Planning Working?

    Denise Harrison is a senior consultant for the Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc. She can be reached at  harrison@cssp.com.

    © Copyright 2015 by Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI — Reprint permission granted with full attribution.